Nerdgasmic

I know, I said I would be doing the best champions in WWE history next....and I will...but its taking a bit longer than I though (seriously you know how many great candidates their are just for the intercontinental championship? not to mention the WWE title.....) So while I'm working to get that wrapped up there was this thing called Wrestlemania last night....hopefully you saw it. But if you didnt, dont worry thats what I'm here for with my first ever Wrestlemania review. Now this isnt going to be a blow by blow review......cause again if your reading this, I assume you saw the show......its just a quick overview of my opinion on each match and a 1 to 5 ranking of how good it was. So with that said, we start where Wrestlemania did: Match #1 US Championship match between Kalisto and Ryback. To be honest, this was a much better match than I expected, and a great telling of the classic "big man vs little man" story. Ryback for his part actually did a great job of playin

So its that time of year again for wrestling fans, its WRESTLEMANIA Season. So in honor of tomorrows Wrestlemania 32 I figure I'll do a look back at the best and worst champion for each title in WWE history. Of course, as I like to end on high notes, we start with the worst. Now some quick rules, 1) First we are only looking at championships recognized by the WWE and champions who won the belt under the WWE banner.  This means for example, that the WCW Championship IS recognized championship, however Ric Flair is ineligible for this list as none of his reigns occurred during the time WWE controlled the belt. Booker T meanwhile WOULD be eligible as his 4th and 5th title reign happened under the WWE banner, but only his last 2 reign would be considered for his standings on either list. By the same token the ECW world title under the WWE banner is eligible, but the ECW tag titles are not as they never appeared in WWE.  2) any titles whos histories are considered one and the same